Archive for Eco-Driving

The “Cat” Is Sleek Again! Jaguar C-X75 Unveiled Paris Motor Show 2010

Possibly one of the nicest looking Jags ever built, the Jaguar C-X75 caused a major stir on the eve of the Paris motor show 2010 with a surprise ultra-low emissions supercar that could catapult it back into the rarefied market it left in 1994, when the 217mph XJ220 ended production.

Jaguar C-X75

Jaguar design chief Ian Callum is already on record with his view that this car is the most beautiful Jaguar that the company has ever produced — prettier, even, than the 1966 XJ13 prototype racer.

He said: “The C-X75 is as close to a pure art form as a concept car can get.” Its grille and headlights, and pure fuselage-like body surfaces, are also a clue towards the looks of Jaguar’s next XK, and its often-rumoured smaller sports car.

The C-X75 pictured here has been unveiled to the world’s media at the Paris show’s press day today. Jaguar officially describes it as “a commemoration of 75 years of Jaguar heritage, and a glimpse at the design cues and technology that will characterise our cars in the future.”

What makes the C-X75 particularly remarkable is its experimental powertrain. Powering this 4.6m-long, 205mph, two-seat berlinetta are four 195bhp electric motors, one at each wheel. They give a combined 780bhp and 1180lb ft of torque, and provide for zero-emissions running, dynamics-enhancing torque vectoring, and pace that even an XJ220 couldn’t match: 0-62mph in 3.4sec, 0-100mph in 5.5sec and 0-186mph in a Veyron-beating 15.7sec.

READ MORE: AUTOCAR.CO.UK


Who Says The Future Isn’t Looking Bright?.. BMW Vision… Very s3xy!

The new BMW Vision EfficientDynamics combines superb driving performance with extremely low consumption. A hybrid drive system and a revolutionary design are among the highlights. The film reveals how a sustainable, but enjoyable future BMW will look like.

NASA may have solution to the “cleaner motoring” question!




Since its inception in 1958, NASA has been harnessing the unique properties of hydrogen to conduct missions. NASA's hydrogen technologies enable electrical power, life support and transportation systems. The agency continues to research, develop and test hydrogen technologies for future human space exploration vehicles as well as advanced terrestrial aircraft. One of the innovative ways in which NASA is implementing hydrogen usage is in its power cells.

Astronauts have been using them for power aboard spacecraft since the 1960s. Soon, perhaps, they'll be just as common on Earth - powering cars, trucks, laptop computers and cell phones. By combining hydrogen fuel with oxygen, Fuel Cells can produce plenty of electric power while emitting only pure water as exhaust. They're so clean that astronauts actually drink the water produced by fuel cells on the space shuttle. While Fuel Cells promise to be the environmentally-friendly power source of the future, some types run too hot to be practical and you can't "just fill 'er up" with hydrogen at most corner petrol stations. And fuel cell-based cars and computers are still relatively expensive. These obstacles have relegated fuel cells to a small number of demo vehicles and some speciality uses, such as power aboard the space shuttle and back-up power for hospitals and airports.

Now NASA-sponsored research is helping to tackle some of these obstacles. By finding a way to build "solid oxide" fuel cells that operate at half the temperature of current designs - 500°C instead of a blistering 1,000°C - researchers at the Texas Center for Superconductivity and Advanced Materials (TcSAM) at the University of Houston hope to make this kind of fuel cell both cheaper to manufacture and easier to fuel.

"Our key advance was making the heart of the fuel cell (the sheet of electrolyte that controls the flow of electrically charged ions) - out of a thin film only one micron thick," says Alex Ignatiev, the director of the NASA-funded TcSAM." In contrast, today's off-the-shelf solid-oxide fuel cells have electrolyte layers 100 microns thick or more (a micron is one thousandth of a millimetre). "The thinness cuts down internal resistance to electric current, so we can get comparable power output at much lower operating temperatures." To make this ultra-thin layer, Ignatiev and his colleagues at TcSAM don't simply shave down a chunk of bulk material until it's thin enough. Instead, they grow the electrolyte atom by atom, depositing one layer of atoms at a time in a process called epitaxy. The thin films in TcSAM fuel cells are about 1,000 atoms thick. The same power at half the temperature creates a domino effect of cost savings. For one, cheaper materials can be used to build them, rather than the expensive heat-tolerant ceramics and high-strength steels demanded by 1,000-degree fuel cells. The automobiles that would use these fuel cells can also forgo exotic materials and elaborate heat-dissipation systems, lowering manufacturing costs. All of this tips the scales of economic feasibility in the right direction.

Research Source: Science@NASA

Hybrid History. A 20TH Century Lesson.

early-lohner-porsche.jpgIf you have wondered about the origins of the hybrid engine, then you’ll find this, a fascinating post from Auto Time Machine:

Let’s go back in time and learn a little piece of history about hybrid engines and fuel cells during the 20th century. I bet this stuff is older than your Mercedes S430 radiator hose. Anyway, let’s dig in with the details provided by my source!

THE 20TH CENTURY

1904: Henry Ford starts his assembly-line production of “low-priced, lightweight, gas-powered vehicles” and as a result, the Electric Vehicle Company was unsuccessful in the next few years.

1905: American engineer H. Piper records a copyright for a petrol-electric hybrid car.

1913: Steamers and electrics were about to be phased out with the discovery of the self-starter which provided convenience to drivers to start gas engines. Sales of electric cars went down to 6,000 and the Ford Model T sells nearly 182,000 gasoline vehicles.

1920-1965: The period which the mass-production of electric and hybrid cars went stationary.

1966: First bill introduced by Congress with a recommendation to use electric vehicles to reduce air pollution.

1970s: The Arab oil embargo of 1973 brings increased gasoline prices and a new interest in electric and hybrid vehicles.

READ MORE:

VRT – Co2 Emissions Poll… Eco-Intitiative or Motorist Burden?

CO2 Emissions have become a major concern, in particular for motorists, with the new VRT (Vehicle registration Tax), based on a car’s carbon emissions. In a bid to address the environmental effects of vehicle’s, all new cars registered from 1 July 2008 will have their motor tax rate based on the CO2 emissions level. A detailed list of vehicle emissions’ ratings is available from vrtireland.com. This will see many people buying cars with a lower emissions rating in order to avoid the higher tax brackets, but are cars with lower emissions any friendlier to the environment.

While lowering the motoring carbon footprint is the responsibility of each individual, does buying a car with low emissions really mean you are easing the burden on the environment… or are we getting an unbalanced perspective with car buyers being made scapegoat. In some instance a vehicle may have low emissions, but a high carbon footprint as a result of production, materials used or just by the car manufacturer’s neglect of its corporate responsibility to the environment. The production of a car alone can offset the benefits of lower fuel consumption and emissions, if manufacturer’s neglect their corporate burden.

The new VRT is a great idea and should in theory reduce the effects motoring has on the planet, but if we want real change, is it not time the Irish government and governments in general place a corporate burden to produce eco-friendly car, firmly on car manufacturers? I believe, that if there was a manufacturer’s tax placed on car makers (based on emissions & overall carbon footprint) and the companies required to foot the bill, we would inevitably see an earnest attempt towards more eco-friendly vehicles.

Do you think that, the Irish government should place a corporate burden on car makers to pay a tax based on CO2 emissions? Who should be held accountable for a car’s effects on the environment? I would appreciate if readers would take a moment to complete the CO2 emissions ‘micro poll’ (Below) and let me know what you think!

Useful related links: CO2.ie Blog / vrtireland.com / Sustainable Energy Ireland

Green options – What Gasoline Alternatives?…

fuelecocar.jpegMost petrol-heads would agree that there’s nothing like the appeal, sound and power of a 5.0L V10 engine – but let’s be honest: It’s time to change that mindset… the appeal of clean air rates pretty high too! So what are the alternatives to gasoline:

Battery-electric and hybrid-electric vehicles:
Battery-electric cars draw all their power from an onboard battery, while hybrids use a combination of battery and gas motors to drastically increase fuel efficiency.

Biodiesel:
A non-toxic fuel made from vegetable oils, animal fats and waste cooking oil. Biodiesel can be mixed with regular diesel fuel in just about any diesel engine and helps reduce emissions by about 60 to 80 per cent…

Ethanol:
A fuel made from the fermented sugars and starches found in agricultural products like corn and wheat. Ethanol burns with roughly 40 per cent lower emissions than gasoline and is a renewable fuel source. Most modern gasoline engines can already run safely and effectively on a blend of up to 85 per cent ethanol and 15 per cent gasoline and many gas stations across Canada already offer gas with 10 per cent ethanol content.

Fuel Cells & Hydrogen:
Probably the most interesting and controversial option are fuel cells. Fuel cells combine hydrogen and oxygen to create electrical current, with the hydrogen capable of being sourced from a variety of fuels. Engines running on hydrogen produce virtually no emissions other than water and vapour, and can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by between 30 and 90 per cent depending on the source fuel used.cross Canada already offer gas with 10 per cent ethanol content.

Natural Gas:
Popular in Europe and Asia, natural gas is abundant and runs cleaner than gasoline. Many taxi and bus fleets already run on the fuel. Regular gasoline vehicles have to be modified to run on natural gas, but conversions can be expensive.

Propane:
Propane is a clean-burning fuel that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 20 per cent and also contains many fewer toxic pollutants than gasoline. Contrary to popular belief, propane is actually less likely to ignite in a car accident than gasoline, due to requiring higher concentrations and a much higher temperature to ignite.

Source: Metro

Related News: Petrobas creates biofuels unit.

 

 

Ironman… Tesla Electric Sportscar!

ironmangarage.jpg

Marvel Comics’ Tony Stark (Ironman), crime-fighting billionaire industrialist/inventor, has a Tesla sports car parked in his garage! Among the other exotic motors is the 100% electric sports car as seen in the recent screen-grab from the Iron Man Super Bowl ad. I think green car lovers everywhere will be aching to see what a 100% electric supercar can do!

Source: AutoBlogGreen

BP Green Refueling Vehicles.

Considering the carbon footprint of the average passenger plane, I thought this little bit of news was extremely weird… even ironic.

Air BP, the specialized aviation division of BP, introduced a zero-emissions aircraft refuelling vehicle at the Dubai Air Show 2007.

Each of Air BP’s Environmentally Friendly Refuelling Vehicles (EFRVs) is powered by a 96-volt DC motor coupled to the standard Isuzu manual transmission. The battery bank is charged from grid power in off peak times, taking between 2-4 hours.

On-board solar panels charge two 12 or 24 volt batteries, which in turn power the brake interlock system, lights, hydraulic power pack and a small air compressor. Any surplus power from these solar panels is directed to the main 96-volt battery bank.