Tag Archive for Environment

NASA may have solution to the “cleaner motoring” question!




Since its inception in 1958, NASA has been harnessing the unique properties of hydrogen to conduct missions. NASA's hydrogen technologies enable electrical power, life support and transportation systems. The agency continues to research, develop and test hydrogen technologies for future human space exploration vehicles as well as advanced terrestrial aircraft. One of the innovative ways in which NASA is implementing hydrogen usage is in its power cells.

Astronauts have been using them for power aboard spacecraft since the 1960s. Soon, perhaps, they'll be just as common on Earth - powering cars, trucks, laptop computers and cell phones. By combining hydrogen fuel with oxygen, Fuel Cells can produce plenty of electric power while emitting only pure water as exhaust. They're so clean that astronauts actually drink the water produced by fuel cells on the space shuttle. While Fuel Cells promise to be the environmentally-friendly power source of the future, some types run too hot to be practical and you can't "just fill 'er up" with hydrogen at most corner petrol stations. And fuel cell-based cars and computers are still relatively expensive. These obstacles have relegated fuel cells to a small number of demo vehicles and some speciality uses, such as power aboard the space shuttle and back-up power for hospitals and airports.

Now NASA-sponsored research is helping to tackle some of these obstacles. By finding a way to build "solid oxide" fuel cells that operate at half the temperature of current designs - 500°C instead of a blistering 1,000°C - researchers at the Texas Center for Superconductivity and Advanced Materials (TcSAM) at the University of Houston hope to make this kind of fuel cell both cheaper to manufacture and easier to fuel.

"Our key advance was making the heart of the fuel cell (the sheet of electrolyte that controls the flow of electrically charged ions) - out of a thin film only one micron thick," says Alex Ignatiev, the director of the NASA-funded TcSAM." In contrast, today's off-the-shelf solid-oxide fuel cells have electrolyte layers 100 microns thick or more (a micron is one thousandth of a millimetre). "The thinness cuts down internal resistance to electric current, so we can get comparable power output at much lower operating temperatures." To make this ultra-thin layer, Ignatiev and his colleagues at TcSAM don't simply shave down a chunk of bulk material until it's thin enough. Instead, they grow the electrolyte atom by atom, depositing one layer of atoms at a time in a process called epitaxy. The thin films in TcSAM fuel cells are about 1,000 atoms thick. The same power at half the temperature creates a domino effect of cost savings. For one, cheaper materials can be used to build them, rather than the expensive heat-tolerant ceramics and high-strength steels demanded by 1,000-degree fuel cells. The automobiles that would use these fuel cells can also forgo exotic materials and elaborate heat-dissipation systems, lowering manufacturing costs. All of this tips the scales of economic feasibility in the right direction.

Research Source: Science@NASA

VRT – Co2 Emissions Poll… Eco-Intitiative or Motorist Burden?

CO2 Emissions have become a major concern, in particular for motorists, with the new VRT (Vehicle registration Tax), based on a car’s carbon emissions. In a bid to address the environmental effects of vehicle’s, all new cars registered from 1 July 2008 will have their motor tax rate based on the CO2 emissions level. A detailed list of vehicle emissions’ ratings is available from vrtireland.com. This will see many people buying cars with a lower emissions rating in order to avoid the higher tax brackets, but are cars with lower emissions any friendlier to the environment.

While lowering the motoring carbon footprint is the responsibility of each individual, does buying a car with low emissions really mean you are easing the burden on the environment… or are we getting an unbalanced perspective with car buyers being made scapegoat. In some instance a vehicle may have low emissions, but a high carbon footprint as a result of production, materials used or just by the car manufacturer’s neglect of its corporate responsibility to the environment. The production of a car alone can offset the benefits of lower fuel consumption and emissions, if manufacturer’s neglect their corporate burden.

The new VRT is a great idea and should in theory reduce the effects motoring has on the planet, but if we want real change, is it not time the Irish government and governments in general place a corporate burden to produce eco-friendly car, firmly on car manufacturers? I believe, that if there was a manufacturer’s tax placed on car makers (based on emissions & overall carbon footprint) and the companies required to foot the bill, we would inevitably see an earnest attempt towards more eco-friendly vehicles.

Do you think that, the Irish government should place a corporate burden on car makers to pay a tax based on CO2 emissions? Who should be held accountable for a car’s effects on the environment? I would appreciate if readers would take a moment to complete the CO2 emissions ‘micro poll’ (Below) and let me know what you think!

Useful related links: CO2.ie Blog / vrtireland.com / Sustainable Energy Ireland

Lukworth Links! April 11th, 2008

Here’s a blog I’m hooked on, Dante And The Lobster.

Digiblog with some very useful pointer on A Greener Office.

The Cedar Lounge Revolution explores our Fear of flying

Animator Vs. Animation – This is great… check it out, if you haven’t already!

Lukworth Links! March 13th, 2008

Hate to admit it but I don’t fully understand podcasting, so the past week I’ve been reading blogs and online tutorials on the subject, trying to get a handle on it!… not sure I understand it any better now, though. Hence the reason I haven’t blogged in a few days… that and the fact I haven’t had anything I wanted to write about until today:

A brand new blog I think is well worth ranting about is Lower (Carbon) Footprint, the new blog from Tom Raftery tackling the important issue of ‘Green IT’ and information on lowering the carbon footprint… So if you only check out one new blog this week, give it a look!

Greenpeace… Well meaning eco-blunder!

_44449035_heathrow_gp_203body.jpgWhat the hell are GreenPeace thinking?

BBC News reports: Four Greenpeace activists were arrested after attempting to hang a banner that read, “Climate Emergency – No Third Runway” on the tailfin of a British Airways Airbus A320. They were arrested, taken to a nearby police station and cited with “unlawful and irresponsible” conduct.

One protester, Anna Jones, said: “Our planet and the people who live on it are in danger. Climate change can be beaten but not by almost doubling the size of the airport.

While I strongly agree with the sentiments expressed and as someone who feels deeply about the environment and global-warming stunts like this don’t help the cause. The end result of actions like this is to associate environmentalist and green issues with the “nut-job” fringe of society… The planet is a real everyday issue, felt by real everyday people and it is only real everyday solutions by these same people, that will bring about the necessary change… not extremist theatrics.

John Gormley… Gormless Environment Minister!

charlize-theron-meteor-awards.jpg

ENVIRONMENT Minister John “Gormless” Gormley is now faced with a potentially embarrassing High Court challenge over a decision made by his predecessor to allow the M3 motorway to be built over an historic site near the Hill of Tara. The Green TD claimed when he came to office last June that he was powerless to over-turn a last-minute order made by outgoing Environment Minister Dick Roche for 2,000 year old ruins discovered last year near the Hill of Tara to be destroyed to make way for the M3. In a turbulent first day in office last June, Mr Gormley declared he had no authority to revoke his predecessor’s order, despite his so-called commitment to protecting heritage. Numerous high profile people have criticised the government’s stance on the Hill Of Tara, including most recently Dublin-born actor Stuart Townsend commenting that:

 

“If more people had protested against the idea of building a road on such as important site, the Government would not have even tried to go ahead with it.

 

But he stressed it was not too late to reverse the project, and said:

 

“People should let their voices be heard. This fim shows what people power can do, and Tara should be no different.

 

There is also a petition in place to stop the development of the motorway on the hill of Tara.

Please follow the link to Sign the Petition

 

Source: Dailymail [via] TaraWatch

Amy Sacks’ Eco-Eyewear… Here’s Lookin’ At You!

amysacks.jpg

Eco-Eyewear… Well, I guess it does make sense and it is something that I’m sure many environmentally conscious people could over-look! I mean, let’s be honest, all those plastic-rimmed glasses have to take their toll on the environment… That the issue being addressed by Amy Sacks with a new range of “renewable source” glasses to create stylish looking frames. Very insightful!

Source: Plenty Magazine [via] Green Daily