Tag Archive for Green

NASA may have solution to the “cleaner motoring” question!




Since its inception in 1958, NASA has been harnessing the unique properties of hydrogen to conduct missions. NASA's hydrogen technologies enable electrical power, life support and transportation systems. The agency continues to research, develop and test hydrogen technologies for future human space exploration vehicles as well as advanced terrestrial aircraft. One of the innovative ways in which NASA is implementing hydrogen usage is in its power cells.

Astronauts have been using them for power aboard spacecraft since the 1960s. Soon, perhaps, they'll be just as common on Earth - powering cars, trucks, laptop computers and cell phones. By combining hydrogen fuel with oxygen, Fuel Cells can produce plenty of electric power while emitting only pure water as exhaust. They're so clean that astronauts actually drink the water produced by fuel cells on the space shuttle. While Fuel Cells promise to be the environmentally-friendly power source of the future, some types run too hot to be practical and you can't "just fill 'er up" with hydrogen at most corner petrol stations. And fuel cell-based cars and computers are still relatively expensive. These obstacles have relegated fuel cells to a small number of demo vehicles and some speciality uses, such as power aboard the space shuttle and back-up power for hospitals and airports.

Now NASA-sponsored research is helping to tackle some of these obstacles. By finding a way to build "solid oxide" fuel cells that operate at half the temperature of current designs - 500°C instead of a blistering 1,000°C - researchers at the Texas Center for Superconductivity and Advanced Materials (TcSAM) at the University of Houston hope to make this kind of fuel cell both cheaper to manufacture and easier to fuel.

"Our key advance was making the heart of the fuel cell (the sheet of electrolyte that controls the flow of electrically charged ions) - out of a thin film only one micron thick," says Alex Ignatiev, the director of the NASA-funded TcSAM." In contrast, today's off-the-shelf solid-oxide fuel cells have electrolyte layers 100 microns thick or more (a micron is one thousandth of a millimetre). "The thinness cuts down internal resistance to electric current, so we can get comparable power output at much lower operating temperatures." To make this ultra-thin layer, Ignatiev and his colleagues at TcSAM don't simply shave down a chunk of bulk material until it's thin enough. Instead, they grow the electrolyte atom by atom, depositing one layer of atoms at a time in a process called epitaxy. The thin films in TcSAM fuel cells are about 1,000 atoms thick. The same power at half the temperature creates a domino effect of cost savings. For one, cheaper materials can be used to build them, rather than the expensive heat-tolerant ceramics and high-strength steels demanded by 1,000-degree fuel cells. The automobiles that would use these fuel cells can also forgo exotic materials and elaborate heat-dissipation systems, lowering manufacturing costs. All of this tips the scales of economic feasibility in the right direction.

Research Source: Science@NASA

A Wasteful Society – tags that don’t fit!

Lately, the “green” issue has been playing a lot on my mind – to be honest, I don’t subscribe to the misconception of being “environmental” equating to the over-played stereotype of the the hemp-smoking, sandal-wearing ‘typecast’ – in general I can’t abide the ignorance of placing these convenient little “tags” on people… most of the eco-aware people I know are very normal everyday people. Over the past few days I’ve been taking a look at my own life and trying to see if there were any ways in which I could contribute further in doing my part – and what has struck me most (carbon footprints etc. aside) is just how wasteful we are as a society. Even without delving too deep into the the environmental issues and the numerous ways we can and are harming the planet, it’s become particularly obvious, that simply by being that little bit kinder to the planet by being less wasteful in our own lives, we could save on our own personal finances as well as on a bigger scale!

VRT – Co2 Emissions Poll… Eco-Intitiative or Motorist Burden?

CO2 Emissions have become a major concern, in particular for motorists, with the new VRT (Vehicle registration Tax), based on a car’s carbon emissions. In a bid to address the environmental effects of vehicle’s, all new cars registered from 1 July 2008 will have their motor tax rate based on the CO2 emissions level. A detailed list of vehicle emissions’ ratings is available from vrtireland.com. This will see many people buying cars with a lower emissions rating in order to avoid the higher tax brackets, but are cars with lower emissions any friendlier to the environment.

While lowering the motoring carbon footprint is the responsibility of each individual, does buying a car with low emissions really mean you are easing the burden on the environment… or are we getting an unbalanced perspective with car buyers being made scapegoat. In some instance a vehicle may have low emissions, but a high carbon footprint as a result of production, materials used or just by the car manufacturer’s neglect of its corporate responsibility to the environment. The production of a car alone can offset the benefits of lower fuel consumption and emissions, if manufacturer’s neglect their corporate burden.

The new VRT is a great idea and should in theory reduce the effects motoring has on the planet, but if we want real change, is it not time the Irish government and governments in general place a corporate burden to produce eco-friendly car, firmly on car manufacturers? I believe, that if there was a manufacturer’s tax placed on car makers (based on emissions & overall carbon footprint) and the companies required to foot the bill, we would inevitably see an earnest attempt towards more eco-friendly vehicles.

Do you think that, the Irish government should place a corporate burden on car makers to pay a tax based on CO2 emissions? Who should be held accountable for a car’s effects on the environment? I would appreciate if readers would take a moment to complete the CO2 emissions ‘micro poll’ (Below) and let me know what you think!

Useful related links: CO2.ie Blog / vrtireland.com / Sustainable Energy Ireland

Green options – What Gasoline Alternatives?…

fuelecocar.jpegMost petrol-heads would agree that there’s nothing like the appeal, sound and power of a 5.0L V10 engine – but let’s be honest: It’s time to change that mindset… the appeal of clean air rates pretty high too! So what are the alternatives to gasoline:

Battery-electric and hybrid-electric vehicles:
Battery-electric cars draw all their power from an onboard battery, while hybrids use a combination of battery and gas motors to drastically increase fuel efficiency.

Biodiesel:
A non-toxic fuel made from vegetable oils, animal fats and waste cooking oil. Biodiesel can be mixed with regular diesel fuel in just about any diesel engine and helps reduce emissions by about 60 to 80 per cent…

Ethanol:
A fuel made from the fermented sugars and starches found in agricultural products like corn and wheat. Ethanol burns with roughly 40 per cent lower emissions than gasoline and is a renewable fuel source. Most modern gasoline engines can already run safely and effectively on a blend of up to 85 per cent ethanol and 15 per cent gasoline and many gas stations across Canada already offer gas with 10 per cent ethanol content.

Fuel Cells & Hydrogen:
Probably the most interesting and controversial option are fuel cells. Fuel cells combine hydrogen and oxygen to create electrical current, with the hydrogen capable of being sourced from a variety of fuels. Engines running on hydrogen produce virtually no emissions other than water and vapour, and can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by between 30 and 90 per cent depending on the source fuel used.cross Canada already offer gas with 10 per cent ethanol content.

Natural Gas:
Popular in Europe and Asia, natural gas is abundant and runs cleaner than gasoline. Many taxi and bus fleets already run on the fuel. Regular gasoline vehicles have to be modified to run on natural gas, but conversions can be expensive.

Propane:
Propane is a clean-burning fuel that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 20 per cent and also contains many fewer toxic pollutants than gasoline. Contrary to popular belief, propane is actually less likely to ignite in a car accident than gasoline, due to requiring higher concentrations and a much higher temperature to ignite.

Source: Metro

Related News: Petrobas creates biofuels unit.

 

 

Lukworth Links! April 17th, 2008

800_airpropelvehicle09planetmechanics.JPGToday’s Lukworths is quite a varied list of posts I’ve been enjoying:Alexia Golez questions O2 Ireland’s iphone price-list!

Check out this great youtube from the chancer: Mean, Green, Slighting Machine.

WeEarth have a great post on the uses of garbage and Gizmodo take a look at a moped that runs on “air” (pictured).

Smemon with a very honest view on learning CSS & XHTML… I’d say many can relate.

Daniel K Sullivan has an interesting speculation on the final cylon… who do you think it is?

Animator Vs. Animation. Part 3!

Lukworth Links! March 13th, 2008

Hate to admit it but I don’t fully understand podcasting, so the past week I’ve been reading blogs and online tutorials on the subject, trying to get a handle on it!… not sure I understand it any better now, though. Hence the reason I haven’t blogged in a few days… that and the fact I haven’t had anything I wanted to write about until today:

A brand new blog I think is well worth ranting about is Lower (Carbon) Footprint, the new blog from Tom Raftery tackling the important issue of ‘Green IT’ and information on lowering the carbon footprint… So if you only check out one new blog this week, give it a look!

Amy Sacks’ Eco-Eyewear… Here’s Lookin’ At You!

amysacks.jpg

Eco-Eyewear… Well, I guess it does make sense and it is something that I’m sure many environmentally conscious people could over-look! I mean, let’s be honest, all those plastic-rimmed glasses have to take their toll on the environment… That the issue being addressed by Amy Sacks with a new range of “renewable source” glasses to create stylish looking frames. Very insightful!

Source: Plenty Magazine [via] Green Daily